WHO
WAS IRVING’S LANDLORD?
Michael Kilgarriff
Glancing again through Bram Stoker’s Reminiscences
I was reminded that when Irving gave up control of the Lyceum Theatre
there were ‘some eighteen years left’ on the lease. So who, I wondered
idly, owned the freehold? And who held the freehold when he first
became the lessee in 1878? I can now reveal, exclusively in these
pages, that H.I.’s ground landlord in 1878 was Augustus Walter Arnold,
and at the end of H.I.’s independent reign in 1899 the freehold was
held by the ‘Trustees of the estate of the late Augustus Walter
Arnold’, who had died ten years earlier.
1816
Right from the start of my
investigations I encountered confusion.
If Stoker’s figure was correct, eighteen years from1899 takes us to
1917, a date which doesn’t square with Görel Garlick’s contention
that in 1814 Samuel James Arnold had obtained a 97-year lease on 254
Strand at £531 per annum. Nor do Stoker’s or Garlick’s figures
agree with A. E. Wilson that the lease was for 99 years at an annual
ground rent of £800, though he does not cite a start date. A
fourth version, by Austin Brereton, agrees with Wilson’s figure for the
ground rent but claims that the lease was for 99 years from1814.
Finally, a history of the Lyceum published in the 1875 Era Almanack
says that S. J. Arnold acquired a 99-year lease in 1809, though
according to Garlick (pp12-14) and every other source this must be
erroneous.
We can be sure, however, that S. J. Arnold’s Lyceum
Theatre a.k.a. Theatre Royal English Opera House—the first theatre in
London to be lit by gas—opened on 15 June 1816; in 1830 it was totally
destroyed by fire, an all too frequent event in that era. (Over
twenty-five years later The Builder was to declare, ‘The fate of a
theatre is to be burned. It seems simply a matter of time.’) Despite
Arnold having neglected to insure the building, a committee of some two
hundred members of the aristocracy and gentry, plus a few leading
theatricals, met to support him and to consider the way forward.
1834
The ground landlord at this time was
the second Marquis of Exeter
whose family had held title to the site since Tudor times. In 1832 he
granted Arnold a renewed lease, and a fifth Lyceum, again built to
Samuel Beazley’s designs and costing £40,000, opened in 1834. The
building was situated slightly west of its predecessor with the
frontage on Wellington Street, a new thoroughfare constructed to
provide access from Waterloo Bridge to Bow Street.
This was the theatre Irving knew. The old site
eventually became a shopping arcade which lasted less than a year, to
be rebuilt in 1864 as the Strand Musick Hall. Perhaps intimidated by
that fanciful k, the public resolutely failed to attend; in 1868 the
auditorium was rebuilt as the first Gaiety Theatre, home of ‘The Sacred
Lamp of Burlesque’.
Samuel James Arnold died on16 August 1852 at the age
of 78, leaving two sons. The elder was Thomas James Arnold and the
younger Augustus Walter Arnold, both of whom had been involved in their
father’s property dealings with Lord Exeter. In 1873, according to
Laurence Irving (p230) the lessee of the Lyceum was ‘Mr. A. W. Arnold’,
but all the evidence suggests that A.W.A. was in fact the ground
landlord, and had been for some twenty years.
1878
H.I. formally assumed the purple on
31 August 1878, the Lyceum
lease showing Sidney Frances Bateman as the lessor and John Henry
Brodribb Irving as the lessee. (See Appendix A.) It also shows that Mrs
Bateman held her lease from Augustus Walter Arnold, and three years
later Augustus offered to sell Irving ‘the whole property’ for
£110,000 (L.I. p379—wrongly indexed as p279). In the event Irving
declined the offer, settling for a lease at £4,500 per annum, a
decision on which L.I. comments:
‘No doubt he took the best advice on the matter. Yet
in view of the vast sums he was to spend on reconstructing and
improving the theatre, there was to come a time when, if he had
possessed the freehold, this expenditure would have been an asset
instead of an irretrievable loss.’
John Culverhouse, curator at Burleigh House, the
family seat of the Cecils, informed me that so far as he could
determine the Exeter estate had had no financial interest in the Lyceum
site since ca.1850. This is confirmed by a memorial (i.e. abstract)
dated 1 April 1852:
‘And also reciting that the sd. Brownlow Marquis of
Exeter had contracted with the sd. Augustus Walter Arnold for the sale
to him of the fee simple in possession of the heredit[ament]s &
premises therein after appointed granted or released or intended so to
be subject to the therein after Indentures of Release granted to Samuel
James Arnold Esq. but free from all other incumbrances....which sd.
Building or Theatre is called or known by the name of the Lyceum or New
English Opera House Together with the Scene Rooms Dressing Rooms and
all other [illegible] Buildings Rooms Staircases and [illegible]
whatsoever belonging to or used or occupied or connected with the sd.
Theatre’
This would seem to show that, just three months before his
death, Samuel James Arnold had been bailed out by his younger son
who bought the entire property from Lord Exeter for an undisclosed
sum. Despite lengthy searches in the London Metropolitan Archives
I have not found any document to settle the matter beyond doubt.
Samuel died intestate, but evidence to support the claim may be adduced
from the value placed on his estate by the administrator, his elder
son, Thomas, at a nominal £100—scarcely the figure one would
expect of a prominent West End landowner.
The Lyceum freehold was certainly in Augustus Walter’s
possession by the early 1880s, for Clause 4 of his will, dated 13 March
1882, permits the disposal, should the trustees deem it advisable, of
‘my property known as the Lyceum Theatre and any property adjoining
thereto’. Thomas’s will, a curiously brief document of only seven
lines, was proved on 24 July 1877, and makes no mention of any specific
properties, so we may assume that at the time of his death he had no
financial interest in the theatre.
Further information has come to light in a deed box,
now in the possession of John H. B. Irving, which as well as the August
1878 lease contains a lease between H.I. and A.W. Arnold dated 23
December 1878; why a new lease after only three months? Perhaps this
was legal house-keeping to tidy Mrs Bateman out of the picture. There
is also a lease between H.I. and A.W.A. dated 6 October 1885 for eight
years. Arnold died in1889 with four years of the lease still to run. If
Irving signed a new lease in 1893 with the trustees of the Arnold
estate, it must have been for ca. twenty-four years, i.e. 1893-99 plus
Stoker’s ‘some eighteen years’, running until 1917. This would explain
another of the disparities concerning the lapse date of S. J. Arnold’s
original lease from Lord Exeter.
1899
If we accept that A. W. Arnold was
the ground landlord in 1878, who
owned the freehold when Irving sold his lease? This proved
comparatively easy to discover. In the National Archives I found a
document dated 21 February 1899 in which The Theatre Syndicate Ltd
(incorporated 3 February) agrees to buy the lease of the Lyceum from
Sir Henry Irving and the freehold from Mary Arnold and Charles Hallett
(‘Trustees of the estate of the late A.W. Arnold’), and sell both to
The Lyceum Theatre Ltd (incorporated only the day before). Mary Arnold
was A.W.A.’s widow and Charles Hallett, so far as I can deduce from
A.W.A.’s will, was one of the Arnold family solicitors, Hallett &
Co.
These transactions having been completed, The
Theatre Syndicate Ltd was wound up on 21 June after a mere four months
of existence. What had been its purpose? One explanation is that the
formation of such a holding company helped to conceal from investors
the extent of profit the directors stood to make on flotation. (See
Appendix B.)
The first production under the new dispensation,
Robespierre, opened on 5 April 1899, and once again, after twenty-one
years, Henry Irving was an employee. But the elaborate romanticism of
the Lyceum style was increasingly at odds with changing times, and the
theatre continued to haemorrhage money. Though the old actor was still
revered, Irving’s star, like his health, was waning. His final
performance at the Lyceum was as Shylock on 19 July 1902; it must have
been an unbearably poignant occasion.
1903-2006: POSTSCRIPT
After that valedictory performance of
The Merchant of Venice the
Lyceum
never re-opened. The upgrading of safety and fire precautions demanded
by the L.C.C., plus the costs of redecoration and refurbishment, were
estimated at £15-20,000, and on 23 April1903 the company put the
entire property up for sale (see Appendix C).
One grandee to
show an interest was the Duke of
Bedford, for whom Beadel Wood of Gresham Street surveyed the building
and adjoining premises, recommending an offer of £95,000. The
asking price was £260,000, which Beadel Wood said was ‘simply
ridiculous’. The highest bid was £244,000 at which sum the
property was withdrawn, or so the press reported at the time. But
financial realities could not be gainsaid, and subsequent to stormy
shareholders’ meetings a Liquidator was appointed on 27 November.
After a raucous
sale of furnishings and fittings on
2 March1904, the Lyceum was demolished, only the front portico and part
of the rear wall remaining, and the company was wound up on 30 July.
The new theatre, designed by Bertie Crewe, opened as a Music Hall on 26
December with Tom Barrasford as licensee. As Irving had predicted the
venture failed, and on 13 December 1906 the property was sold to ‘an
unknown purchaser’ for £119,500, which must have represented a
huge loss for the original investors (see Appendix D).
Land Registry
records show that this ‘unknown
purchaser’ was in fact two persons: Henry Lewis Dillman Engleheart and
Thomas Maxwell Witham, who, the following year, sold the property back
to the Arnold family trust. Even stranger was the discovery that
twenty-five years earlier T. Maxwell Witham had been one of the
witnesses to A. W. Arnold’s will! For me the murky waters of such
property manoeuvring remain opaque, and I can offer no rationale for
any of this wheeling and dealing.
In May1910 Walter
and Frederick Melville acquired the freehold for
£240,000, and the sixth Lyceum was at last enjoying steady hands
on the tiller. The brothers ran the theatre profitably until July1939,
when it was compulsorily purchased by the L.C.C. to make way for road
improvements. Hitler’s War saved the building from such ignominy, and
after a number of incarnations as a ballroom, pop venue, bingo hall,
television studio and occasional playhouse the Lyceum is now, after a
major refurbishment in 1996, once again functioning as a theatre. The
freehold is held by The Theatres Trust, and its future is assured.
APPENDIX A
The Builder
September 28, 1878
‘The Future of Sadler’s Wells and The Lyceum Theatre
The misunderstanding between Mrs.
Bateman and Mr. Henry Irving has
resulted in the former becoming the lessee of Sadler’s Wells, which has
recently been rebuilt... ...we learn that the interior is being
handsomely decorated in anticipation of the opening some time before
Christmas. Miss Bateman (Mrs. Crowe) is, we understand, to be the
leading attraction; and her two sisters, Miss Isabel Bateman and Miss
Virginia Bateman, will be members of the company.
With regard to the
Lyceum, it is stated that the
difference between Mr. Irving and Mrs. Bateman had reference to the
personnel of the company. Mr. Irving is said to have told Mrs. Bateman
that he was resolved to have actors to act with him, and not dolls,
otherwise he would no longer play at the Lyceum. The result was that
Mrs. Bateman threw up the management of the theatre, and Mr. Irving
takes her place. In an address last week to an audience at the
Alexandra Theatre, Liverpool, where he has been performing, Mr. Irving
stated that he had not become the manager of the Lyceum solely to make
money, but mainly to promote true dramatic art, and in that effort he
felt assured he should be supported by his company.’
APPENDIX B
L.I. (pp624-5) states that the
directors of the Syndicate were Joe
Comyns Carr, barrister, playwright and friend of Irving’s, and his two
brothers, one a solicitor and one a financier. It must have been this
latter who drafted the well-nigh incomprehensible agreement against
which Stoker inveighed so earnestly but which Irving signed. H.I. did,
however, accept Stoker’s advice not to take a seat on the board of The
Lyceum Theatre Ltd. As we have seen, this company was founded on 20
February 1899; with Joseph William Comyns Carr as managing director,
the other directors included Frank Curzon (theatrical manager), Charles
Eves (chartered accountant), and William Greet (theatrical manager);
the chairman was Charles Armstrong, described as managing director of a
brewery. While the magic of Irving’s name attracted hundreds of
shareholders, the theatre’s losses soon had the directors at odds.
Armstrong resigned on 26 August 1901, Curzon on 17 June 1902, and Greet
on 29 October 1902. Greet was replaced by Jacob Oppenheim, a cigar
merchant, who in turn resigned on 24 April 1903. This can never have
been a happy ship. A Liquidator (William Barclay Peat) was appointed on
27 November 1903, and the troubled company ceased to exist on 30 July
1904.
Three years after Irving’s death J. Comyns Carr had
the effrontery to write:
‘My relations with Irving were not so close or so
intimate during the later years of his life, and I prefer to think of
him now as I knew him best, before the days of discouragement had
overtaken him. Misfortune and bitterness and ill-health made him
sometimes suspicious of his friends. In my own case I know he entirely
misconceived the motives with which I had sought to recapture for him
his threatened position in the theatre he made famous.’
I don’t think Irving misconceived Carr’s motives at
all. The actor had been right royally stitched up; he knew it, and he
resented it.
<>
APPENDIX C
The Builder
9 August 1902
‘The Lyceum Theatre.
<>We understand that the
share-holders have finally resolved to dispose
of the property rather than carry out the structural alterations
required by the London County Council at an outlay estimated to exceed
15,000l. The company was formed in March, [sic] 1899, to acquire for
275,000l. the freehold estate—covering 22,700 ft. superficial and
valued at 260,000l.—of the theatre, with rentals of adjoining premises,
and the interest of Sir Henry Irving as lessee. The Lyceum Theatre is
one of the oldest established playhouses in the town. It was originally
built in 1765 after designs by James Paine, as an academy and
exhibition-room under that name for the Incorporated Society of
Artists; Garrick purchased the lease from them that the building might
not become converted into a theatre... In 1790 one Lingham, of the
Strand, a breeches-maker, bought the house and opened it for music
performances. Five years afterwards he leased an adjoining plot to Dr
Arnold, the composer, who there built a theatre, but by reason of the
strong opposition of the Covent Garden and Drury Lane managers his
enterprise failed, and the house was used for exhibitions of paintings
and various entertainments and shows, amongst them being Winsor’s
experiments (1803-4) in gas lighting. S. J. Arnold, succeeding his
father, enlarged the building in 1809 for his English Opera and Ballet
House, which gave way to the new theatre for, it is said, 80,000l. in
1816 after Samuel Beazley’s designs, and destroyed by fire on February
16, 1830. The site having been taken for the laying out of
Wellington-street, 1829-30, as an approach to Waterloo Bridge, a new
theatre was built on the present site that is in that street, at a cost
of 35,000l. from plans and designs by Beazley, and opened for English
Opera on July 14, 1834... Alterations of the interior, with new
entrances and exit-doors, and an enlargement of the house by the taking
in of the two restaurants on either side of the portico, were effected
eleven years ago under C. J. Phipp’s superintendence. During thirty
years past the fortunes have been closely identified with Sir Henry
Irving’s dramatic career. Particulars of Sir William Emerson’s award in
the arbitration before him, as between the London County Council and
the proprietors, are given in our number of July 12 last.’
<>
<>
APPENDIX D
The Builder
1 December 1906
<>‘Lyceum Theatre.—In pursuance
of an
Order of the Court this property,
together with Nos. 33-7, Exeter-street, and part of No. 21,
Wellington-street, is offered for sale. It covers an area of 23,500 ft.
and has a total frontage of 423 ft. The present building is a
reconstruction for a music-hall, carried out two years ago by Mr.
Bertie Crewe, of the theatre erected in 1831-4, after Samuel Beazley’s
designs, and enlarged on the sides of the portico by C. J. Phipps in
1891. On April 23 (“Shakespeare’s Day”), 1903, the directors of Lyceum,
Ltd., offered the freehold property for sale and bought it in at
260,000l. Some extensive structural alterations had been required by
the London County Council, which the directors were not willing to
undertake. The effects and materials having been sold in March of the
following year, the rebuilding for a seated audience of 2,800 persons
was at once begun by Messrs. J. Parkinson & Sons, of Newcastle and
Blackpool, and the new house was opened on December 26 1904.’
WORKS CONSULTED - all published in
London
| Brereton, Austin |
The Lyceum and Henry Irving
(Lawrence & Bull1903) |
|
“ |
The Life of Henry Irving 2 vols
(Longmans, Green, and Co 1908) |
| Carr, J Comyns |
Some Eminent Victorians
(Duckworth & Co1908) pp241-2 |
| Garlick, Görel |
To Serve The Purpose of the
Drama—The Theatre Designs and Plays of
Samuel Beazley 1786-1851 (The
Society for Theatre Research 2003) |
| Howard, Diana |
London Theatres and Music Halls
1850-1950 (Library Association 1970) |
Irving, Laurence
|
Henry Irving: The Actor and his
World (Faber & Faber 1951) |
| Mander, Raymond
&
Mitchenson, Joe |
Theatres of London, The (Rupert
Hart-Davis 1963) |
| Stoker, Bram |
Reminiscences of Henry Irving (2
vols) (William Heinemann 1906) |
| Wilson, A. E. |
The Lyceum (Dennis Yates 1952) |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
& SOURCES
Alex Bisset, British Library, British Library Newspaper Library,
Burleigh House, Companies House, Family Records Centre, Garrick Club
(Marcus Risdell), Harbottle & Ellis, John H. B. Irving, Land
Registry (Harrow office), London Metropolitan Archives, National
Archives, Principal Probate Registry, Theatres Trust, Richard Wadhams
(Hogbens Dunphy), Westminster City Archives.
Endnotes
1. A ten-page closely handwritten Indenture in the Middlesex Deeds
Registry, numbered 449 and dated 29 July 1851, sheds some light on
these discrepancies. It is an abstract—a ‘memorial’— which shows that
the site was ‘demised unto the sd. Samuel James Arnold’ on 29 September
1814 for the term of 97 years’, thus agreeing with Görel Garlick.
However, it also gives details of seven further properties adjacent to
the Lyceum which were leased by Samuel on various occasions in 1815,
1816, 1817, 1832 (after the 1830 fire) and again in 1835. In1842 the
New White Horse public house in the Strand, part of Samuel’s leasehold
package, was sold by the Marquis of Exeter for £600 ‘in part
liquidation of the arrears of interest due to him’. By 1847, if I
interpret the legalese correctly, Samuel was still owing £4,780,
a debt which appears to have been paid by his sons, Thomas James Arnold
(1803-77), a barrister and translator, and Augustus Walter Arnold
(1811-89), a solicitor.
2. In 1847 Augustus Walter Arnold was elected to the Garrick Club,
having been proposed by Samuel Beazley, the architect of both the 1816
and the 1834 Lyceum Theatres. In 1873 he seconded H.I.’s re-application
to the Club after the notorious blackballing. His description by the
Chairman as ‘very nearly the oldest member of the Club’ (L.I. p232)
refers to his twenty-seven years’ length of membership rather than his
age, which was then only 62. His father was a founder member of the
Club in 1831.
3. There was considerable expenditure on the fabric of the theatre
even before Irving opened his first season, with many structural and
decorative improvements carried out by Alfred Darbyshire, an semi-pro
actor with H.I. at Manchester but by 1878 a distinguished architect. In
his 1906 book The Art of the Victorian Stage Darbyshire wrote, ‘I need
not enter into the details of my work at the Lyceum Theatre, done for
my friend [i.e. Irving] and to the satisfaction of the Lord Chamberlain
and Mr. Arnold, the owner. Suffice it to say that the words were of
much importance, and that nothing of historic or art value was injured
or destroyed.’ Quoted in Austin Brereton’s The Life of Henry Irving
(1908) vol 1 p271-2. ‘Mr Arnold’ omitted from the index.
4. An interesting clause in the Agreement states that: ‘the
Syndicate reserve the right to nominate four persons to whom the
Company shall grant “ivories” conferring the right of free admission to
the Lyceum Theatre at all times when in the joint or single occupation
of the Company together with the right to occupy any seat in the said
theatre (other than one in a box) remaining unsold at the time fixed
for the commencement of the play then running in the said theatre.’
That this provision should be included shows the value of the
perquisite; such privileged holders’ rights to free admission were
originally inscribed on small plaques of ivory.
5. In 1871 Irving was invited to become leading man at the Lyceum by
H. L. Bateman. On Bateman’s death in 1875 at the age of 62
responsibility for the theatre passed to his widow, Frances. Three
years later, acknowledging that Irving was increasingly restless in the
strait-jacket of employee, Mrs Bateman made over the lease to him,
decamping with her three competent but uninspiring actress daughters to
Sadler’s Wells Theatre, a couple of miles north.
Mrs Bateman died in January 1881aged 57. There was a
fourth actress
daughter, Ellen (Mrs Claude Greppo), born 1845. Kate (Mrs George Crowe)
was born 1842 and died 1917. Virginia (1855-1940), sometimes billed as
Virginia Francis, became Mrs Edward Compton, mother of Fay Compton and
Sir Compton Mackenzie. In 1898 Isabel, her life blighted by unrequited
passion for H.I., entered a Roman Catholic convent. She died in 1934
aged 79.